One Global Church home icon gray
One Global Church my account icon
One Global Church about icon
#

Why are churches in Rwanda closing?

Rwanda churches closed by government
February 11, 2025

Explore By Region

Asia  |  Africa  |  North America  |  South America  |  Antarctica  |  Europe  |  Australia

More From This Region

Over the last year, the Rwandan government has closed thousands of places of worship. Authorities have cited non-compliance with health, safety, and building regulations as primary reasons for the shutdowns. The enforcement is based on a 2018 law that mandated religious organizations to meet specific standards, such as ensuring structural integrity, maintaining hygiene, and requiring clergy to possess formal theological education. The government had provided a five-year period for compliance, which concluded in September 2023. Many institutions, particularly smaller Pentecostal churches, struggled to meet these requirements, resulting in their closure.

As of early 2025, the Rwandan government continues to uphold these regulations, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding citizens from potential hazards associated with substandard worship facilities. Officials argue that the measures are necessary to protect congregants from exploitation and to ensure that religious practices do not compromise public safety. The Rwanda Governance Board (RGB) remains vigilant in inspecting religious institutions and enforcing compliance. While some view these actions as essential for public welfare, others perceive them as infringement upon religious freedom.

In response, many affected churches have sought ways to adapt. Some congregations have merged resources to renovate their facilities, ensuring they meet the required safety and hygiene codes. In addition, many clergy members are pursuing theological education to fulfill the academic qualifications mandated by the government. Despite these efforts, challenges persist, especially for smaller congregations lacking financial means. The closures have prompted discussions within the religious community about the balance between state regulation and religious autonomy, with leaders advocating for a more collaborative approach to address concerns without compromising the essence of religious practice.